SEND

Telford & Wrekin Local Offer

SEND - Local offer


You are here: Home | Home | Test

Test

EHCP Information for Educational Settings TEST

Information, guidance and additional documentation for education settings and proffessionals about EHC Plans and the Annual Review Process.

EHC Assessment Timeline

SEND Eligibility Criteria Downloads

Cognition and Learning Eligibility Criteria

The Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice (Chapter 9.16) allows Local Authorities to develop criteria for deciding whether to undertake a statutory assessment for an EHC plan. The criteria are flexible, adaptable and not applied as a blanket policy. Whilst the criteria are used to support decision making, each case is considered individually. At all times the local authority applies the statutory tests as described in section 36(8) of the Children and Families Act 2014 to determine the appropriateness of a request for an EHC assessment of need.

CL1 Despite graduated school support, the pupil requires higher level specialist resourcing which is different from and additional to the SEN core offer, to access the full curriculum.
CL2 Extreme difficulties in accessing the curriculum through reading and writing, despite the use of a range of alternative methods.
CL3 It is likely that there will be evidence that external professionals such as advisory teachers, Educational Psychologists, have been involved in carrying out a comprehensive assessment of the pupil’s strengths and difficulties. They will have advised on the pupil’s plan. The impact of these strategies and interventions will have been evaluated over time (at least one term) and resulted in minimal progress.
CL4 Telford and Wrekin adhere to the British Psychological Society’s definition of Dyslexia (1999):- ‘Dyslexia is evident when accurate and fluent word reading and/or spelling develops very incompletely or with great difficulty. This focuses on literacy at the word level and implies that the problem is severe and persistent despite appropriate learning opportunities.’
CL5 The pupil may have general learning difficulties and attainments that are recorded at the 1st percentiles or lower for a range of skills, using standardised assessment.
CL6 The pupil’s rate of progress will be consistently low relative to their cognitive ability
  Assessment, Planning and Review
CL7 It is likely that there will be evidence that the level of professional input such as advisory teachers, educational psychologists have been on a regular basis.
CL8 It is likely that there has been a successive programme of advice from external agencies implemented over time
CL9 Consideration has taken place whether it is appropriate to support the family and child’s needs through the CAF and TAC process.
  Grouping for Teaching
CL10 It is likely that the pupil has to access considerable additional targeted teaching in small groups or individually for at least half the day.
CL11 The extent of additional and different organisation required is in excess of what would normally be provided in school provision i.e. as specified within the Local Offer.
  Curriculum and Teaching Methods
CL12 Access to higher levels of differentiation normally provided within SEN support
CL13 Access to teaching of specific targeted skills using evidence based interventions such as Precision Teaching 1:1 daily, Toe by Toe, Beat Dyslexia small group 20 mins, 2x/week, Nessy-individual 20mins 3x/week.
  Human Resources
CL14 SENCO or specialist teacher to provide appropriate set targets for individual.
CL15 Access to evidence based teaching programmes for literacy, numeracy and general learning difficulties.

Download the SEND Criteria Cognition and Learning

Communication and Learning Eligibility Criteria

The Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice (Chapter 9.16) allows Local Authorities to develop criteria for deciding whether to undertake a statutory assessment for an EHC plan. The criteria are flexible, adaptable and not applied as a blanket policy. Whilst the criteria are used to support decision making, each case is considered individually. At all times the local authority applies the statutory tests as described in section 36(8) of the Children and Families Act 2014 to determine the appropriateness of a request for an EHC assessment of need.

CI1 Despite graduated school support, the pupil requires higher level specialist resourcing which is different from and additional to the SEN core offer, to access the full curriculum.
  SLCN
CI2 Receptive and expressive language skills within the 1st and 2nd percentiles indicating a severe language delay or disorder.
CI3 Significant difficulties understanding others.
CI4 Significant difficulties communicating their thoughts and ideas with others.
CI5 Significant interaction difficulties as a result of their speech and language communication challenges.
  Autistic Spectrum Disorder: ASD
CI6 High levels of social isolation which prevents the establishment of consistent relationships with peers and /or adults.
CI7 Highly atypical behaviours such as obsessive, challenging or withdrawn to the extent that it prevents their inclusion in a well planned and supported curriculum.
CI8 Consistently unable to adapt to changes in routines in well planned time tables including highly differentiated class/subject teaching.
CI9 Significant difficulties with social interaction
CI10 Presentation of high levels of anxiety associated with ASD that prevents access to curriculum and engagement with peers.
CI11 Problems with language communication and imagination that impacts on engagement with peers and adult

Supporting evidence will include

  Assessment, Planning and Review
CI12 Evidence that over time regular TACs have been held with the family/carers and external professionals (meetings between school and parents do not constitute a TAC but can be appended to next TAC). Action plans have been implemented and evaluated.
CI13 It is likely that there will professional input such as SALT, Advisory Teachers; Educational Psychologists; social worker; CAMHS workers etc has been on a regular basis
C14 It is likely that there has been a successive programme of advice in relation to communication and interaction /Autism from external agencies implemented over time.
CI15 Systematic monitoring of students progress show that the interventions and provision is having a limited impact.
  Grouping for Teaching
CI16 The school SEND offer is clear and accessible to all students parents/communities.
CI17 The pupil has access to considerable additional targeted teaching in small groups or individually for the significant part of each day..
CI18 The extent of additional and different organisation required is in excess of what would normally be made from school provision through the graduated response i.e. is within the higher needs bracket above 15 hours support per week.
CI19 Some pupils may have needs that are better met through more specialist provision such as SALTIS, advice from Outreach service, advisory teacher (ASD) service or educational psychology service
  Curriculum and Teaching Methods
CI20 Curriculum access through the usual mainstream groupings may not be appropriate for most areas of the academic curriculum.
CI21 Extensive individualised programmes will be required to support the pupil’s social and emotional, communication and sensory needs.
CI22 This may involve the use of autism-specific teaching techniques or alternative communication methods supported by appropriate equipment and materials. This should include Autism Environment Audit.
CI23 Teaching interventions will be part of a multidisciplinary approach e.g. SALT, OT. Programmes may include:- Language Steps, Language Land, Listen with Lucy, Teaching Talking, Secondary Talk, Build to Express, Social Stories.
  Human Resources
CI24 There is strong evidence that there is a whole school approach to meeting the needs of the pupil with communication and interaction difficulties / Autism i.e. Autism policy; strategic aims; development of in-house provision; commitment to training in this area.
CI25 The SENCo should lead on assessment, planning and evaluation in liaison with pastoral staff and external professionals.
CI26 Teachers/TAs with additional qualifications in SEND and experience of working with pupils with social communication difficulties or Autism are likely to be involved in providing for the pupil.
CI27 There is consistent active parent/carer involvement in programmes offered to support them and their child e.g. EarlyBird, EarlyBird Plus, Cygnets.
CI28 Opportunities for parents to access parent support groups. e.g. PODs, STAR Group.

Download SEND Criteria Communication and Interaction

Social Emotional and Mental Health Eligibility Criteria

The Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice (Chapter 9.16) allows Local Authorities to develop criteria for deciding whether to undertake a statutory assessment for an EHC plan. The criteria are flexible, adaptable and not applied as a blanket policy. Whilst the criteria are used to support decision making, each case is considered individually. At all times the local authority applies the statutory tests as described in section 36(8) of the Children and Families Act 2014 to determine the appropriateness of a request for an EHC assessment of need.

SEMH 1 Despite graduated school support, the pupil requires higher level specialist resourcing which is different from and additional to the SEND core offer, to access the full curriculum.
SEMH 2 The pupil will have very limited access to the curriculum due to the significant, challenging behaviours they present.
SEMH 3 These behaviours may be associated with a mental health condition.
SEMH 4 There will be evidence of extreme, complex emotional and behavioural difficulties of considerable duration and frequency in a variety of school situations, resulting in adverse consequences for pupil and severely affecting other pupils and adults in a detrimental way (e.g. unpredictable, bizarre, obsessive, violent, dangerous or severely disruptive behaviour).
SEMH 5 Extreme complex emotional behaviour difficulties can also include severe self-harming and avoidance of social interaction.

Supporting evidence will include

  Assessment, Planning and Review
SEMH 6 Evidence that over time regular TACs have been held with the family/carers and external professionals (meetings between school and parents do not constitute a TAC but can be appended to next TAC). Action plans have been implemented and evaluated.
SEMH 7 Evidence that the family in which the child resides has received support from Early Help and Family Intervention Practitioners It is likely that there will be professional input such as Advisory Teachers; Educational Psychologists; Social workers; CAMHS workers etc has been on a regular basis.
SEMH 8 There has been a successive programme of advice from external agencies implemented over time.
SEMH 9 Systematic monitoring of students progress show that the interventions and provision is having a limited impact.
  Grouping for Teaching
SEMH 10 The pupil has access to considerable additional targeted teaching in small groups or individually for the greater part of each day.
SEMH 11 The extent of additional and different organisation required is in excess of what would normally be provided in school provision i.e. as specified within the Local Offer
SEMH 12 Some pupils may have needs that are better met through more specialist provision either for a short term measure or long term placement.
  Curriculum and Teaching Methods
SEMH 13 Additional activities and different activities will be required to retain the pupil’s application and interest in the curriculum.
SEMH 14 Alternative programmes of study should be provided using or setting up facilities within the school or off site provision where appropriate.
SEMH 15 Extended individualised programmes of study, behaviour and emotional support will be required to access the curriculum. Interventions and support may include circle of friends, SEAL materials, peer mentoring, counselling support, visual timetables, individual learning passports, Build to Express.
  Human Resources
SEMH 16 The SENCo should lead on assessment, planning and evaluation in liaison with pastoral staff and external professional
SEMH 17 Teachers/TAs with additional qualifications and/or experience of pupils with very significant emotional and behavioural difficulties are involved in providing for the pupil.
SEMH 18 Multiagency direct involvement is in place for pupils with substantial support from visiting specialists.
SEMH 19 There is strong evidence that there is a whole school approach to meeting the needs of the pupil with social, emotional and behavioural needs i.e. behaviour policy; strategic aims; development of in-house provision; commitment to training in this area.
SEMH 20 There is consistent active parent/carer involvement in programmes offered to support them and their child i.e. Incredible years; Lets get Cooking; Why weight?

Download SEND Criteria Social, Emotional and Mental Health

Sensory and Physical Eligibility Criteria

The Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice (Chapter 9.16) allows Local Authorities to develop criteria for deciding whether to undertake a statutory assessment for an EHC plan. The criteria are flexible, adaptable and not applied as a blanket policy. Whilst the criteria are used to support decision making, each case is considered individually. At all times the local authority applies the statutory tests as described in section 36(8) of the Children and Families Act 2014 to determine the appropriateness of a request for an EHC assessment of need. 

SP1 Visual Impairment
The pupil has a severe or profound visual impairment which impacts extremely upon behaviour and on individual learning/learning environment. 
SP2 Hearing Impairment
Children and Young People who have a permanent bilateral sensori-neural hearing loss which has resulted in considerable Receptive and /or Expressive linguistic delay as evidenced by scores on standardised linguistic assessments.
SP3 There will be evidence of long term curriculum access issues and there will be major training issues for staff supporting the pupil. 
SP4 CYP who, when assessed using NatSIP Criteria (National Sensory Impairment Partnership) require ongoing regular frequent support, of at least fortnightly frequency, from a Teacher of the Deaf. 
SP5 Without a high level of specialist SIS support, attainment levels are unlikely to reflect ability levels and will present a barrier to inclusion in local educational settings and progression to FE/HE/training/employment.
SP6

Physical
The physical difficulties/medical condition is complex, severe and long-term. The pupil requires daily individual interventions from a suitably trained adult and support on a long term basis which is over and above that which schools
are expected to provide which costs up to a nationally prescribed level per pupil per year. There will be clear evidence provided by the relevant medical consultant supporting the level of provision within the request information.

Such pupils may have additional learning, communication or behaviour difficulties requiring specialist intervention. They may exhibit emotional/behavioural problems (withdrawal, disaffection, reluctance to attend). Rate of learning may be
affected by absences, fatigue, medication

Supporting evidence will include:

Assessment, Planning and Review
SP7 The LA undertakes identification, assessment and planning with a multi-professional focus and issues an Education, Health and Care Plan.
SP8 The Education, Health and Care Plan will specify long-term outcomes and plans for provision. The Provision Map is drawn up from the long-term outcomes and should be reviewed at least three times a year
SP9 A Qualified Teacher of the Visually Impaired (QTVI) assists school/setting by assessing functional vision, assessing need for Braille or large print; advising on equipment required, assessing the school/setting access facilities and planning for learning and physical adaptations.
SP10 The Provision Map will include vision specific targets, delivery methods and evaluation techniques.
SP11 There is clear evidence that the level of professional input from Advisory Teachers and other allied professions is at a high level and ongoing, at least fortnightly in frequency. 
SP12 There is clear evidence of the need for ongoing School/Teacher of the Deaf planning meetings to meet pupil need with at least annual video recording by Sensory Inclusion Service to plot longitudinal linguistic progress and development of the skills essential to access the curriculum.
SP13 Provision is reviewed at least annually, with those involved in meeting the CYP’s needs.
SP14 A decision is made at each Review as to whether the pupil continues to require a high level of intervention and is monitored by SEND officers annually.
SP15 The Provision Map will include vision specific targets, delivery methods and evaluation techniques
SP16 The Education, Health and Care plan will be reviewed at least annually with those involved in meeting the needs of the pupil contributing to the Review. A decision is made at each Review as to whether the pupil continues to require and Education, Health and Care plan. Or whether the needs of the pupil can be met at School Support Level.
SP17  The LA monitors the outcome of the Review annually
SP18 The LA undertakes identification, assessment and planning with a multi-professional focus and issues an Education, Health and Care Plan.
SP19 The Education, Health and Care Plan will specify long-term goals and plans for provision. The IEP is drawn up from the long-term goals and should be reviewed not less than three times a year.
SP20 A Qualified Teacher of the Visually Impaired (QTVI) assists school/setting by assessing functional vision, assessing need for Braille or large print; advising on equipment required, assessing the school/setting access facilities and planning for learning and physical adaptations
SP21 The Provision Map will include vision specific targets, delivery methods and evaluation techniques.
SP22  The Education, Health and Care Plan is reviewed annually with those involved in meeting the needs of the pupil contributing to the Annual Review. A decision is made at each Annual Review as to whether the pupil continues to require and Education, Health and Care Plan. Or whether the needs of the pupil can be met at School Support Level.
SP23 The LA monitors the outcome of the Annual Review
Grouping for Teaching
SP24 The pupil has access to additional targeted teaching in group time or individually for part of each day . This may include:
  • Small group/individual time for practising new skills;
  • Individualised teaching of new or specialist skills
  • Training for mobility and independence in and around the school/setting
SP25 Training in the use of specialist technological equipment.
SP26 The pupil has access to considerable additional targeted teaching in small groups or individually for significant parts of the school day.
SP27 The extent of additional and different organisation required is in excess of what would normally be provided in school provision i.e. is within the higher needs bracket above 15 hours support.
SP28 Some pupils may have needs that are better met through more specialist provision either for a short term measure or long term placement. 
SP29 The Teacher of the Deaf liaises with the SENCo/ class teacher and/or subject teachers on 
issues such as
  • Acoustics
  • Radio Aid use
  • Social and emotional issues
  • Curriculum access
  • Inclusion issues
SP30 The pupil has access to additional targeted teaching in group time or individually for part of each day :
  • Small group/individual time for practising new skills
  • Individualised teaching of new or specialist skills
  • Training for mobility and independence in and around the school/setting
  Training in the use of specialist technological equipment.
Curriculum and Teaching Methods
SP31 Individualised programmes may be required. This may involve the use of specialised equipment or teaching techniques or alternative access methods such as Braille (including tactile media), large print use, specialist low vision aids or auditory means.
SP32 Joint planning by the key- worker/teacher and the Qualified Teacher of the Visually Impaired or therapist or school nurse to give time for preparation and adaptation of accessible materials.
SP33 Adaptation of teaching methods e.g. encouraging greater verbalization during lesson delivery, enabling handling or close inspection of materials.
SP34  Usual mainstream groupings may not be appropriate for some areas of the academic curriculum. Extensive individualised programmes may be required.
SP35 This may involve the use of specialised teaching techniques or alternative access methods supported by appropriate equipment and materials. Intervention may include :Weekly hearing aid, radio aid checks and electro-acoustic testing of this equipment by the Teacher 
of the Deaf.
SP36 Advisory and direct teaching support/pre- tutoring from Teacher of the Deaf.
SP37 Subject specific issues addressed, advice and implementation on appropriate access arrangements for internal and external examinations.
SP38  Individualised programmes may be required. This may involve the use of specialised teachingtechniques or alternative access methods such as Braille (including tactile media), large print use, specialist low vision aids or auditory means.
SP39 Joint planning by the key- worker/teacher and the Qualified Teacher of the Visually Impaired to give time for preparation and adaptation of accessible materials.
SP40 Adaptation of teaching methods e.g. encouraging greater verbalization during lesson delivery, enabling handling or close inspection of materials.
SP41 Individualised programmes may be required. This may involve the use of specialised teaching techniques or alternative access methods such as Braille (including tactile media), large print use, specialist low vision aids or auditory means.
SP42 Joint planning by the key- worker/teacher and the Qualified Teacher of the Visually Impaired to give time for preparation and adaptation of accessible materials.
SP43 Adaptation of teaching methods e.g. encouraging greater verbalization during lesson delivery, enabling handling or close inspection of materials.
SP44  
SP45  
Human Resources
SP46 Where the LA maintains Education Health and Care plan, SEND officers will monitor this via the Review on an annual basis in partnership with parents/carers SIS or therapists and other relevant specialist agencies.
SP47 Involvement of other SIS professionals as recommended by the QTVI. These may include specialist mobility input, ICT and low vision aid referrals.
SP48 Ongoing direct support and advice from external specialists will be provided as specified in the Education Health and Care plan.
SP49 It is recommended that school/setting staff attend SIS-VI Annual Course and also school/setting based INSET is delivered.
SP50 The SENCo should lead on planning and evaluation in partnership with parents/carers, the Sensory Inclusion Service and other relevant specialist agencies.
SP51 Substantial support from visiting Teacher of the Deaf (between 1 and 3 visits per week) to advise and support the school in meeting the CYP needs
SP52 Additional TA support time will probably be required in many lessons. For some pupils with exceptional needs there may be a requirement for support in school situations outside the classroom.
SP53 There is strong evidence that there is a whole school approach to meeting the needs of the pupil with hearing loss ( inclusion policy; strategic aims; development of in-house provision; commitment to training such as uptake of places offered on the Sensory Inclusion Service one day course and school based INSET)
SP54 There is consistent active parent/carer involvement in programmes offered to support the family and CYP.
SP55 Where the LA maintains Education Health and Care Plan, LA officers will monitor this via the Annual Review in partnership with parents/carers SIS and other relevant specialist agencies.
SP56 Advisory and direct teaching support/pre-tutoring from a Qualified Teacher of the Visually Impaired (QTVI).
SP57 Involvement of other SIS professionals as recommended by the QTVI. These may include specialist mobility input, ICT and low vision aid referrals.
SP58 Ongoing direct support and advice from external specialists will be provided as specified in the Education Health and Care Plan.
SP59 It is recommended that school/setting staff attend SIS-VI Annual Course and also school/setting based INSET is delivered.

Download the SEND Criteria Sensory and Physical

EHC Assessment Panel

EHC Needs Assessment Request Form and Guidance

Annual Review Guidance

Annual Review Templates

Additional Annual Review Documentation